Report cards › Food › Gilbert Foods LLC.
HEARN KIRKWOOD
CSWH grade A (94)
Method v1.0 (how we grade), based on the records below; exact score 93.75.
| Indicator | Grade | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Recalls (40%) | A (100) | No recalls found Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. For current recalls see FDA and USDA. |
| Ingredients (40%) | B (84) | Tier A: 0 of 12 products · A (100) (25%) Tier B: 3 of 12 products (Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), DATEM, Sodium aluminum sulfate) · C (58) (15%) · products |
| FDA warning letters (20%) | A (100) | None found to the owner Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. |
Shown, not graded: recall reasons (none) · IARC notes (5 products) · FDA dye pledge: none on FDA's tracker.
Recalls, Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026
No FDA recall matched to this brand.
Store-brand and co-packer recalls count on a brand only when a UPC in the recall matches one of its products.
Ingredients on our watch list
Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) Tier B in 1 of 12 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(4): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
- West Virginia HB 2354 (2025), W. Va. Code § 16-7-2(b)(7): banned in food by state law (WV), effective Jan 1, 2028. Under court challenge (enforcement blocked for now): International Association of Color Manufacturers v. Singh.
Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) Tier B in 1 of 12 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(5): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
DATEM Tier B in 1 of 12 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(15): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
Sodium aluminum sulfate Tier B in 1 of 12 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(35): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
Sodium nitrite Tier C in 5 of 12 products
IARC classifies "Nitrate or nitrite (ingested) under conditions that result in endogenous nitrosation" in Group 2A (IARC Monographs Vol. 94 (2010): Ingested Nitrate and Nitrite). Shown only; not part of the grade.
Products (6)
- HAM & GOUDA ON CROISSANT SANDWICH, HAM & GOUDA ON CROISSANT · UPC 766375793410 · FoodData Central record of Dec 7, 2022
B DATEM ("datem"); C Sodium nitrite ("sodium nitrite") · Report an error - ITALIAN HOAGIE DRESSING, ITALIAN HOAGIE · UPC 766375261650 · FoodData Central record of Feb 16, 2023
B Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) ("bha"); B Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) ("bht"); C Sodium nitrite ("sodium nitrite") · Report an error - SPICY VEGETARIAN QUINOA WRAP, SPICY VEGETARIAN · UPC 766375013839 · FoodData Central record of Dec 7, 2022
B Sodium aluminum sulfate ("sodium aluminum sulfate") · Report an error - CHICKEN & BACON COBB SALAD, CHICKEN & BACON COBB · UPC 766375753100 · FoodData Central record of Dec 22, 2022
C Sodium nitrite ("sodium nitrite") · Report an error - TURKEY + HAM CHEF SALAD ROMAINE LETTUCE, HARD COOKED EGGS, GRAPE TOMATOES, WHITE TURKEY, HAM, CHEDDAR CHEESE WITH CHIANTI ITALIAN DRESSING, TURKEY + HAM CHEF SALAD · UPC 766375753049 · FoodData Central record of Jan 6, 2022
C Sodium nitrite ("sodium nitrite") · Report an error - TURKEY BREAST & HAM CHEF SALAD, TURKEY BREAST & HAM · UPC 766375251347 · FoodData Central record of Dec 22, 2022
C Sodium nitrite ("sodium nitrite") · Report an error
Labels change: each row shows the date of its FoodData Central record. A brand that has changed a recipe can report it with "Report an error".
FDA warning letters to Gilbert Foods LLC., Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026
None found from FDA food offices.
FDA notes that later events may have changed the regulatory status of what a letter discusses.