Report cards › Food › Paiellis Bakery Inc.
PAIELLI'S
CSWH grade C (69)
Method v1.0 (how we grade), based on the records below; exact score 69.2308.
| Indicator | Grade | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Recalls (40%) | A (100) | No recalls found Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 29, 2026. For current recalls see FDA and USDA. |
| Ingredients (40%) | F (23) | Tier A: 10 of 13 products (Potassium bromate) · F (0) (25%) Tier B: 3 of 13 products (DATEM, Azodicarbonamide (ADA), Potassium iodate) · C (62) (15%) · products |
| FDA warning letters (20%) | A (100) | None found to the owner Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 29, 2026. |
Shown, not graded: recall reasons (none) · IARC notes (0 products) · FDA dye pledge: none on FDA's tracker.
Recalls, Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 29, 2026
No FDA recall matched to this brand.
Store-brand and co-packer recalls count on a brand only when a UPC in the recall matches one of its products.
Ingredients on our watch list
Potassium bromate Tier A in 10 of 13 products
- California AB 418 (2023), the California Food Safety Act, Stats. 2023 ch. 328, Health and Safety Code § 109025: banned in food by state law (CA), effective Jan 1, 2027.
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(28), § 431.0815(a)(9): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
DATEM Tier B in 2 of 13 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(15): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Tier B in 1 of 13 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(3): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
Potassium iodate Tier B in 1 of 13 products
- Texas SB 25, 89th Legislature (2025), Health and Safety Code § 431.0815 (warning label), § 431.0815(a)(29): warning label required by state law (TX), effective Jan 1, 2027. Under court challenge: American Beverage Association v. Paxton.
Products (10)
- BOMBER BUNS · UPC 71476002041 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
B Azodicarbonamide (ADA) ("azodicarbonamide"); B DATEM ("diacetyl tartaric acid esters", "datem"); A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - HOT DOG BUNS · UPC 71476002089 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate"); B Potassium iodate ("potassium iodate") · Report an error - ITALIAN BREAD · UPC 71476002201 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - ITALIAN ROUND BREAD · UPC 71476002034 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - PANETTE TWIN LOAVES · UPC 71476002225 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - PIZZA DOUGH · UPC 71476002065 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - PRESLICED KAISER ROLLS · UPC 71476002195 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - SANDWICH BUNS · UPC 71476002058 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
B DATEM ("diacetyl tartaric acid esters", "datem"); A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - SLICED ITALIAN BREAD · UPC 71476002027 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error - SLICED WHITE BREAD · UPC 71476002010 · FoodData Central record of Oct 28, 2021
A Potassium bromate ("potassium bromate") · Report an error
Labels change: each row shows the date of its FoodData Central record. A brand that has changed a recipe can report it with "Report an error".
FDA warning letters to Paiellis Bakery Inc., Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 29, 2026
None found from FDA food offices.
FDA notes that later events may have changed the regulatory status of what a letter discusses.